Monday, August 12, 2013

Solutions not Suspensions


 
One of the local newspapers had a story a few days ago announcing that the number of failing schools in New Orleans had decreased to 9[i] from 22 last year.  Undergirding this great story is the faithfulness of loving parents, the hard work and commitment of dedicated educators, and the various supporting partnerships that help students grow and thrive. 

Unfortunately, we don’t see the same success happening in our schools’ out-of-school suspension rates.  For the 2011-2012 school year:

·         59% of public schools in New Orleans have an out-of school suspension rate higher than the state average of 9.2% *

·         34% of public schools in New Orleans have an out-of-school suspension rate higher than 20%[ii]
It is time to consider school discipline as a metric of a school’s success.  Successful schools should also be measured by how many students they keep engaged in school.

This led me to think about my own experiences with suspensions.  I used to think that suspensions were the most effective way to change student behavior; if you asked me about a consequence for a student, I’d just immediately to suspension.  But after being in schools for some time, my opinions on zero tolerance and suspensions have changed.  Here’s one of those stories…
I was shocked.  I didn’t even register that he had touched me, let alone that he had tried to pick me up to move me from the doorway where I was blocking his departure from class.  My experience up until that point was that he was a quiet, but participatory with a calm demeanor.  This day, I had to remind him several times of the classroom rules.  He wouldn’t keep his head up from the desk, he wouldn’t get a textbook, and he wouldn’t work with his partner to complete the assignment.  The last time I tried redirecting his behavior, I also told him that he would have to serve part of his lunch period with me, which would start when his class’ period ended.  He met the news expressionless.

He remained in his seat when the bell rang and his classmates left for lunch.  I collected my things and talked to him at the same time.  It was probably a diatribe about being working hard in class, how he didn’t follow the classroom rules and how I expected better behavior.  I was close to the door when I noticed that he was coming toward me to leave the room.  “You can’t leave, you have to stay for your detention.”  He didn’t say one word, just continued moving toward the door.  By the time he had reached the doorway, I had placed myself in between him and the hallway.  “You need to get back to your seat.  This is a lunch detention.”  In a matter of moments, things changed; he was running down the stairs and I was crying in the classroom.
By the end of the day, his mother had been called in for a conference for the next morning and I was confused.  From my perspective, he should have been suspended and I couldn’t understand how he was still in school at the end of the day.  I felt betrayed by the Assistant Principal and questioned her competency in the position.  I wondered how I could work in a school where students were allowed to touch the adults.  I considered quitting that day.  I convinced myself that I wouldn’t ever feel safe in the school.

I was invited to the conference, but asked to sit out in the hallway while the Assistant Principal spoke to the student and his mother with the social worker present.   When I was allowed into the room, I was able to talk about what happened in class and express to him how it made me feel.  The social worker asked him if he understood my perspective.  The Assistant Principal asked him to tell me what he had told them.  By the end of the conference, I learned about the crisis his family was experiencing and realized how it was impacting his judgment, his disposition and his behavior.   He apologized, “Ms. Mac, I wasn’t trying to hurt you or nothing, I was just mad and I didn’t want to stay in that room.  I’m sorry Ms. Mac, I like your class.  I won’t do nothing like that again.”  As a result, he had to serve a week of afterschool detention and the social worker and I designed activities to work on anger management with him.  He and his family received referrals to family services organization.  I’m not sure that I understood or agreed with the decision, but I complied with the decision.  So did he.
It took some time, but I’m glad that the student wasn’t suspended.  To be sure, this kind of situation is unacceptable.  PERIOD.  I believe there needed to be a consequence for the inappropriate behavior, and now I’m confident that suspending him may not have had the same significance for this student and would not have gotten us closer to what the problem was for him.  In our conversation, I heard a sincere apology, he received a consequence, we got to the root of the problem and he understood that he had people in the school community who would give him a second chance.  It was a moment that would be instructive for the rest of my career as an educator.  School discipline isn’t just about safety- it's about personal growth and character; suspensions don't result in either.  I’m glad that the Assistant Principal stepped in and with the Social Worker found a better solution than suspension. 


[ii] For more information about zero tolerance policies in New Orleans’ public schools, see JJPL’s Suspension Matters series at http://jjpl.org/suspensions-matter/
 

No comments:

Post a Comment